As George Feltenstein is as pleased to note, this year marks the 15th anniversary of the inauguration of The Warner Archive Collection, an innovation in DVD marketing and production that catered to movie-loving disc collectors.

The Rain People was one of the first offerings of the The Warner Archive, and exactly the kind of feature the WAC was invented to service: something for collectors, not a Blockbuster rental.
→ The Rain People is a major step in the filmic career of Francis Ford Coppola — who is still making big news 55 years later with his wholly personal epic Megalopolis. Once upon a time, Coppola and a dozen or so like-minded young filmmakers striving to re-invent the Hollywood system started their own San Francisco- based company, American Zoetrope. Promising a bounty of pictures to win youthful audiences, Coppola talked Warners into letting him film his own screenplay about a road trip from New York to the Midwest while actually on the road. The result was a movie that was talked about but little seen … in these ‘crossover’ years the major studios bankrolled quite a few counterculture movies, but didn’t know how to profitably distribute them.

Sort of an Americanized foreign film with lofty artistic ambitions, Coppola’s moody tale of a runaway wife is nevertheless a very individualized statement. In a way, Coppola’s hilarious You’re a Big Boy Now and his strained Finian’s Rainbow were as much commercial warm-ups as was his earlier Dementia 13 from his Roger Corman days. Too heartfelt to really be pretentious, The Rain People is sort of an alternate Easy Rider: an alienated housewife drives off in search of her own identity.
Coppola’s on-the-road realism is evident from the start. Natalie Ravenna (Shirley Knight) steps into her station wagon one morning and takes off in a Westerly direction, leaving her husband Vinny (Robert Modica) and her Long Island house behind. She makes intermittent phone calls home, trying to explain that she feels imprisoned in their marriage and needs some time to be alone. Vinny’s frantic response turns hostile when Natalie tells him that she’s pregnant and might want to abort the child. Natalie picks up a handsome young hitchhiker in the rain, Jimmy ‘Killer’ Kilgannon (James Caan). She has notions of a quick one-night, perhaps thinking the experience will put an end to her confusion.
Killer turns out to be a brain-damaged college football player ‘dumped’ by his former caretakers. He’s a functional child, calm but easily distracted and incapable of understanding much or doing adult work. Natalie tries to discard her hitchhiker with a prospective employer whose daughter was once Killer’s girlfriend. And the owner of a reptile farm is eager to ‘take care’ of the thousand dollars Killer is carrying. Like a lost puppy, Killer is still present when Natalie meets Gordon, a widowed highway patrolman (Robert Duvall) who makes it clear that he wants to take her to bed. Natalie was looking for personal freedom, but her odyssey only brings more unwanted attachments.

Coppola’s free-form screenplay was engineered to take advantage of surprises and accidents that happen along the route of filming that stretched from New York to Nebraska. His movie has an authentic ‘Kerouac’ feeling, one felt in only a couple of early ’70s movies, notably Two-Lane Blacktop. It rains often, mirroring Natalie’s inner sadness and prompting Killer’s rather portentous dialogue line:
“Rain people are people made of rain. When they cry, they disappear.”
Coppola normally avoided such canned profundity. Killer is unfortunately one of those magic mental handicapees found only in the movies. He’s practically monosyllabic, incapable of putting a thought together, yet he comes out with such a touching phrase. It works in context because James Caan says it so naturally … and because we’re eager to see The Rain People tale on a familiar shape, even if the shape is that of a precious art film. We quickly grasp that Killer could represent Natalie’s unborn child, a nagging responsibility that cannot be ignored.

Killer isn’t a particularly realistic simpleton. In addition to his poetic skills, he’s rigorously decent, polite, housebroken and noble, Gunga Din in a linebacker’s body. Killer becomes an emancipator of oppressed animals at the ratty reptile farm. His salient forebears at the time were Lenny from Of Mice and Men and perhaps Boo Radley (Robert Duvall!) from To Kill a Mockingbird. Since then we’ve seen any number of love stories about child-men that form ‘pure’ romantic relationships with deserving females. I call movies like Untamed Heart and Benny & Joon ‘Human Lassie’ fantasies. The guys are like pet dogs, docile boyfriends lacking troublesome agendas of their own. All that’s missing is intelligent conversation. A baby is unnecessary, as the boyfriend already fulfills that role. What girl could resist?
The troubled Natalie is just trying to find herself and enjoy what she calls a Heavy Date, a theme that in 1969 was a major statement for feminism. What’s keeping millions of unfulfilled housewives from Just Saying No to marital servitude and hitting the road? But Natalie’s rash escape provides no relief. Her motorcycle cop Gordon is good-looking and available, but also a bigger chauvinist than her husband. Unfortunately, Their hot date winds up at Gordon’s trailer, where Gordon’s curious, precocious daughter Rosalie (Marya Zimmet) asks if she can watch. Nothing’s easy for poor Natalie.
Francis Coppola’s ease with actors is already in evidence; both of his leading men would of course become big stars in his Godfather films. All of the acting is natural, even James Caan in a role that could easily have invited jeers of “can I feed the rabbits?” Always in search of ‘real’ moments, Coppola shoots some scenes in unbroken takes, as when Natalie sits on the edge of a motel room bed and assesses her personal emptiness.

In that way Shirley Knight reminds us of Antonioni’s Monica Vitti. Natalie’s phone calls home are powerful statements in support of feminist assertiveness in the face of a cultural mandate to fulfill other people’s expectations. Gordon is something of a pig, and his bedside tactic is to claim that his late wife meant nothing to him. Neither Caan nor Duvall try to run away with the movie — their characters offer solid support to Ms. Knight’s Natalie. The movie is a strong showcase for all three of them and especially director Coppola, who shows that he’s firmly in charge of everything that reaches the screen.
Associative flashbacks illuminate the past for Natalie, bursts of handheld shots from Natalie’s wedding, as if she’s trying to understand where that happy woman went. Likewise, we see impressions of Killer’s previous football action, and the tragic true backstory of Gordon and his first wife. The editor on The Rain People is Barry Malkin, who would work on many of Coppola’s best pictures. The editorial and production crew credits are fat with future talent: George and Marcia Lucas, Richard Marks, Walter Murch.
The Rain People shares a shelf with a few other late- ’60s sensitive relationship films stressing strong performances: I Never Sang for My Father, The Subject Was Roses, Rachel, Rachel. With its unhappy, rain-soaked conclusion, Coppola’s film was likely greeted by Warners with the same blank looks they gave Zoetrope’s follow-up science fiction movie THX 1138, directed by a very young Zoetrooper, George Lucas. Coppola and Lucas’s timing clicked soon thereafter, making them top directors and their names household words.

I certainly enjoyed “The Rain People” for it’s excellent performances and a solid Ronald Stein music score and a real whopper of an ending. But, I have to say, I disagree about this film having a powerful “Femminist” viewpoint: no matter how much the Natalie character is presented as wanting to “find herself”, she comes off as downright irresponsible (when she calls her husband to tell him she is pregnant and wants to abort it, resulting in the husband to chew her out over her actions, I couldn’t help but agree with the husband…and I’m in the middle when it comes to the whole abortion issue!) and even childish in her actions resulting in some pretty bad decisions. And, for a “femminist”, she really has no qualms gravitating towards Robert Duval’s swinging dick Chad-character, practically turning her “assertivness” into a weak facade: she’s willing to dump Mr. Responsible (ie, her husband) in exchange for Mr. Exciting (ie, Duvall’s agressive cop character)!